Academic Research Insight: Can Bond Portfolios Be “Factorized”?

Updated on

Get The Full Hedging Series in PDF

Get the entire 10-part series on Hedging in PDF. Save it to your desktop, read it on your tablet, or email to your colleagues

Also read:

  • Baupost Letter Points To Concern Over Risk Parity, Systematic Strategies During Crisis
  • AI Hedge Fund Robots Beating Their Human Masters

What are the research questions?

  1. Can the concepts contained in equity “factors” translate to the corporate bond market?
  2. Do single factor bond portfolios generate alpha?
  3. Do multifactor bond portfolios contribute additional value?

What are the Academic Insights?

  1. YES. Using bond characteristics only, definitions for Value (based on differential between actual vs “fair” credit spread), Low Risk (based on maturity, and credit rating), Momentum (based on previous six month return with one month lag) and Size (based on total company debt) were defined and used to construct single and multifactor portfolios.
  2. YES. For the Investment Grade universe of bonds and using the IG bond market return as the risk adjustment, positive alphas were observed for Size (1.12% sig), Low Risk (.41% not sig), Value (1.3% not sig) and Momentum (.30% not sig) factors.  For the High Yield universe of bonds, and using the HY bond market return as the risk adjustment, positive alphas were observed for Size (5.5% sig), Low Risk (1.45% not sig), Value (4.26% sig) and Momentum (2.04% sig) factors.
  3. YES. When combined into a multifactor bond portfolio, large reductions in tracking error, increases in the information ratio as well as significant alphas were observed. Outperformance relative to the IG and HY bond markets were .78% (sig) for the IG multifactor bond portfolio and 3.31%(sig)  for the HY multifactor bond portfolio.

Returns were presented after transactions costs.

Why does it matter?

The few existing studies on factors in the corporate bond market examine only one or two factors. This study includes four factors using a consistent methodology throughout the single data set.  The time period covered 1994-2015.  The authors used monthly constituent data from the Barclays U.S. Corporate Investment Grade Index and the Barclays U.S. Corporate High Yield Index.

The results indicate that investors should explicitly include factors in their strategic allocation to the corporate bond market. Performance attributes of multifactor bond portfolios include diversification benefits, lower tracking error (risk); and higher information ratios (return to risk).

The authors conducted robustness tests with respect to the factor definitions used and found that although equity factor definitions do produce alpha when applied to bonds, they are lower (with the exception of momentum) than when bond specific definitions are used.

What is the most important chart from the paper?


The results are hypothetical results and are NOT an indicator of future results and do NOT represent returns that any investor actually attained. Indexes are unmanaged, do not reflect management or trading fees, and one cannot invest directly in an index. Additional information regarding the construction of these results is available upon request.


Note: This site provides NO information on our value investing ETFs or our momentum investing ETFs. Please refer to this site.


Join thousands of other readers and subscribe to our blog.


Please remember that past performance is not an indicator of future results. Please read our full disclosures. The views and opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of Alpha Architect, its affiliates or its employees. This material has been provided to you solely for information and educational purposes and does not constitute an offer or solicitation of an offer or any advice or recommendation to purchase any securities or other financial instruments and may not be construed as such. The factual information set forth herein has been obtained or derived from sources believed by the author and Alpha Architect to be reliable but it is not necessarily all-inclusive and is not guaranteed as to its accuracy and is not to be regarded as a representation or warranty, express or implied, as to the information’s accuracy or completeness, nor should the attached information serve as the basis of any investment decision. No part of this material may be reproduced in any form, or referred to in any other publication, without express written permission from Alpha Architect.


Definitions of common statistics used in our analysis are available here (towards the bottom)


Article by by Tommi Johnsen, PhD - Alpha Architect

Leave a Comment