Massif Capital letter to investors for the first quarter ended March 31, 2017.
For the quarter ending March 31, 2017, the core portfolio was down 2.25% net of all fees and expenses compared to +6.91% for the MSCI All Cap World Index.1 Since inception in June 2016 through the end of the first quarter 2017, the core portfolio has returned 17.11% vs. 13.45% for the MSCI All Cap World Index. Returns in separately managed accounts may differ from the core portfolio based on initial investment date.
Given the current positive mood of the markets and economy, the underperformance during Q1 is disappointing. However, it is important to remember that the portfolio, at large, is still very much in its infancy. For example, CNXC, at ten months, is the oldest position in the portfolio. As a result, our positions, thus far, have lacked the opportunity to benefit from one of our primary strengths: a long-term perspective. Additionally, while overall economic sentiment data has been overwhelmingly positive; hard, financial data has been middling, which helps shed light on our performance this past quarter.
Driven primarily by the prospect of a business friendly political environment, the first quarter of 2017 began with bullish exuberance and an unleashing of so-called “animal spirits.”2 The unleashed “animal spirits” have been quantified and evaluated via survey-based economic measures, for example ISM Purchasing Managers, one of the most well-known Purchasing Manger indices. At the end of March, the ISM was at its highest level since October of 2014. Other well-known indicators such as consumer confidence, as measured by organizations such as The Conference Board, estimate consumers have not been as confident as they are now since December 2000.
Two recently published market commentaries, one from John Hussman of Hussman Funds and one by The Economist, help shed light on the issues of soft economic data vs. hard financial data.3 As Mr. Hussman notes in his analysis, such measures have historically not correlated with future economic and market returns. The 5-year rolling correlation of sentiment survey results with actual economic results is roughly zero, suggesting no relationship. One might say that sentiment indicators are just noise, the colloquial term in statistics for data with no informational value.
Although I am skeptical of sentiment, this characterization of sentiment is likely taking it too far. As with everything related to investing, reality is far more complex than a simple analysis suggests. Although the soft indicators should be read with great caution, people/companies are “responsive to a kind word,” as John Maynard Keynes noted. Outcomes will be affected by expectations, although it is unlikely that expectations will determine outcomes alone. Expectations do represent the prevailing bias, and as the chart to the left from the Economist suggests, the prevailing bias is positive, even if that positivity is overdone and not supported by underlying fundamentals.
For our portfolio, this means continuing our cautious accumulation of undervalued equities. My preference would be for panicked or depressed sentiment, but I will not wait for such a situation to buy. Timing the market is a rare talent, and I have no evidence that I possess it, as such I don’t attempt it. Instead I seek to accumulate at all times, through careful selection, a portfolio of assets acquired because of their cheapness in relation to their probable and potential intrinsic value.
Timing the market is an attempt to read investor sentiment, which is a fickle thing, and subject to change for any numbers of reasons. Marine Le Pen could win the French Presidential elections and threaten a French exit from the EU; Brexit could progress poorly; Russia and the US may fail to reach a détente; China may experience political upheaval; or any number of possible missteps by the Republican party attempting to pursue their policy agenda could occur. With any of these events, a dramatic and swift change in sentiment could follow.
Unlike investor sentiment, valuation does correlate strongly with future market returns, although not necessarily the returns of the economy: the stock market and the economy do not necessarily run together. Furthermore, valuation is not prone to dramatic short-term changes. As such, both valuation and a long-term perspective serve as the foundation of all the portfolio’s current and future investments. When the market is being guided higher by sentiment, rather than business fundamentals, as in the quarter that just ended, the portfolio will likely trail the broader market. At the same time, the focus on value means our portfolio returns will be tied to the businesses I invest in more than the mercurial feelings of the investing public.
Massif Capital – New Positions
In the first quarter, two new positions were added to the portfolio: Barnes and Nobles Education (BNED) and Lucara Diamonds (LUC on the Toronto Stock Exchange).
BNED: Barnes and Nobles Education is a spin-off from Barnes and Nobles focused exclusively on the college/university bookstores. The company runs approximately 751 brick and mortar, campus bookstores and about as many digital only college bookstores. The market is well structured for consolidation and growth, with roughly half of US colleges and universities responsible for running their own bookstores. Additionally, BNED only has only one competitor in the space: Follett, which is privately held and runs 1,200 campus bookstores. The campus bookstore business is facing difficult times as a result of declining student admissions and continued belief that books, and textbooks in particular, are going to be revolutionized into extinction by technology. That has not yet come to pass and it is unclear if it ever will.
LUC: Lucara Diamonds is a Canadian Diamond mining company with operations in Botswana. The firm has been producing diamonds from its Karowe mine since 2013 and has generated impressive returns every year since. This is a result of the steady stream of unique and exceptional diamonds the mine produces. Like BNED, the industry is well structured for returns with limited competition and tight control of supply by larger producers De Beers and Alrosa (a Russian Diamond Miner). Lucara is the fifth mining firm Massif Capital has invested in. To date, our mining investments have produced an average return of 54%.
Additional Portfolio Commentary
Unfortunately, the biggest movers in the portfolio in the first quarter were all to the downside. Two positions, in particular, contributed to our below average results: Och-Ziff (OZM) and Nevsun (NSU).
OZM: There are few things as maligned these days as active financial management. Och-Ziff suffers from not only the current trend against active management, but also a recent investment scandal involving bribery in Africa. In both cases, I believe the market has over done it. The trend towards passive investment and factor investing (a related shift in investment style currently underway at large institutional investors) is the result of a belief that both will be reliable and safe approaches to achieving better returns. Like many “sure-fire” paths to successful investing have in the past, these two in vogue approaches will prove less then they are claimed to be.
As a result of the confluence of events, OZM has experienced a meaningful reduction in assets under management and a hit to cash flow in the form of a SEC fine. Furthermore, the market has decided it has a