Should you be overwhelmed with the urge to pick your feet in Poughkeepsie, or if you’d prefer, maybe ripping off a piece of baguette after shooting a French detective point blank in the face, then ‘tis the season.
For a dose of not so jolly Christmas cheer, you can actually experience the cinematic pleasure of both simultaneously in the dual opening scenes of the first Rated-R movie to win the Oscar for Best Picture. That is, if you’re keen to watch for the first or umpteenth time 1971’s The French Connection. This raw, gritty semi-documentary film chronicles what was then the largest narcotics bust of all time. The 1962, $32 million seizure equates today to over $256 million.
But don’t watch the film as an exercise in calculating the street and time value of money. Rather sit back and enjoy the display of contrasts between the good(ish) cops and the bad guys. Gene Hackman commands his first Best Actor Oscar as Jimmy “Popeye” Doyle alongside his partner Buddy “Cloudy” Russo, an exceedingly young Roy Scheider. These two relentlessly pursue Alain Charnier, portrayed elegantly by Fernando Rey, and his ruthless hitman Pierre Nicoli, played by Marcel Bozzuffi. The cops tend to eat cold pizza on street corners in the brutal winter cold as they surveil the smug smugglers indulging in the finest cuisine on offer in the cozy warmth of Manhattan’s fanciest restaurants. Thankless pursuits to be sure, but ultimately for the greater good except for the glaring fact that in the end, Charnier escapes.
And as for the greater good in the here and now? Well, despite what we’re told by the mainstream media and the condescending tone they refuse to renounce, a cresting wave of discontent has crashed onto our country’s shores. This repudiation of perceived injustice will no doubt also be manifest at European polls in the year to come. Voters are increasingly convinced that the bad guys have been winning for a very long time. So they continue to reject the status quo even given the lack of viable alternatives other than pure and simple ‘change,’ regardless of the form that change happens to take.
It will therefore come as no surprise if the Italians vote down the balloted referendum this Sunday. Forget for a moment the relative irrelevance of what’s the vote actually addresses. OK, if you must know, at issue is gridlock that allows legislation to enter a perpetual cycle, as in nothing ever gets done. The two chambers of Italy’s parliament can effectively veto each other’s decisions in perpetuity. Separately, the regions retain great powers. A ‘yes’ to Prime Minister Matteo Renzi’s constitutional reform referendum brain child would limit both the powers of the Senate and local governments.
The funny thing is, the Italians pass a lot of laws — more than their peers in France, Germany, the UK and the US. They just aren’t enforced. That nagging detail helps explain why the country has had over 60 governments in the past 70 years. Add to this the high stakes game of chicken Renzi is playing. A ‘yes’ vote will also award the party that wins future elections bonus seats in the dominant chamber of parliament and a guaranteed majority for five years, laying the groundwork for the rise of a strongman. It’s safe to say the Italians have long and bad memories of past dictators.
A recent visit to Italy and chats with men and women on the street revealed a general mistrust of Renzi and his Machiavellian ways. One PhD-educated Florentine resident was bitter in recounting that Renzi, the city’s former mayor, took his current post by force, pushing his party colleague Enrico Letta to resign as prime minister. This shrewd move prompted Italy’s President to ask Renzi to form a government, which he gladly did with himself as head of the leading party. He maneuvered his way into office with no say on the people’s part. For some reason, this act enraged the electorate.
In fact, the majority of those in the Five Star Movement, the main opposition party, are generally well-educated. They wholeheartedly support their leader, former comedian Beppe Grillo, who enjoyed wild success before he was banished from publicly owned television for his satirical political attacks. Rather than skip a beat, Grillo began to blog and became a powerful voice of the people, demanding freedom of speech and speaking out against political and corporate corruption, child labor and globalization. Given its druthers and a power seat, Five Star has promised to give Italians a vote to leave the euro, the currency bloc, rather than the European Union. Not surprisingly, the media and establishment relish in besmirching Grillo’s name, which of course only serves to endear him to the people that much more. Sound familiar?
Atop this icy slope, Renzi precariously teeters; he has vowed to step down if his referendum fails, which seems likely. This would open the door for general elections, possibly as soon as early next year. Grillo could then conceivably ally with another opposition party and rise to become the next prime minister. Connect the dots and you see what has markets so worried and that’s without one word of mention of the tenuous state of Italian banks.
That brings us north, to France, the next major country scheduled to hold elections come May. How will the outcome of the Italian referendum connect the French to the Italians, and by extension, the rest of the world’s economy and financial system? It sure would be nice to know the answer to that question, especially if your first name is Angela and your last, Merkel.
According to the German newspaper Die Welt, French banks’ total exposure to Italian debt is in excess of €250 billion, three times that of Germany (though Deutsche Bank alone has €12 billion of exposure, which raises yet another red flag on the bank’s viability.) Spain (€45 bn), US (€42 bn), the UK (€30 bn) and Japan (€28 bn) follow. If these numbers seem rather large, it bears repeating that after the US and Japan, Italy boasts the world’s third largest sovereign bond market, hence the potential to inflict damage on the masses in one fell swoop.
If you think populist pugilism is rampant now, imagine what a banking crisis would stir up among the protestors. While a far-right Marie Le Pen might have seemed a stretch to be France’s next president, the surprise victory of the less-right Francois Fillon all but ensures France will follow in the footsteps of Great Britain and America in electing dark horses. Lest you suffer undue levels of suspense, yes, Fillon was publicly derided. Nicolas Sarkozy, the ex-president, was assured by his advisors that Fillon was not to be taken seriously, nicknaming the front runner, “Mister Nobody.”
Are you beginning to detect a trend? Do you think the so-called elites also sense a meme? Or will they continue to label the rise of change agents as one-offs, maintaining their arrogant dismissiveness that continues to work against them?
The most startling development that’s shot up through the grassroots is the identity of those raising their fists in concert. Fillon didn’t just win his primary run-off; he ran away with two-thirds of the vote. That’s saying something for a candidate who has vowed to curb union power, end France’s 35-hour work week, shrink the country’s labor code to 150 pages from 3,000 (!), and by the way is a social conservative and practicing Catholic. In other words, he’s the last person you’d expect the French to embrace. Public spending as a percentage of France’s GDP is 57 percent, appreciably higher that the generous Eurozone average of 49 percent.
Perhaps the true underlying message is that globalization, for all of its merits, simply didn’t work out the way it was designed on paper. The hollowing out of the middle class is anything but contained to one country or even a handful of them; it too is a global phenomenon as evidenced by the breadth of the countermovement. It can’t help that the monetary policy response has not only widened the global inequality gap further, but managed to do so in such a deeply insulting way as to incite economic riots.
When, thus, does political risk become economic, financial and