WordPress database error: [Disk full (/tmp/#sql_485c_0.MAI); waiting for someone to free some space... (errno: 28 "No space left on device")]
SELECT t.*, tt.* FROM vw_terms AS t INNER JOIN vw_term_taxonomy AS tt ON t.term_id = tt.term_id INNER JOIN vw_term_relationships AS tr ON tr.term_taxonomy_id = tt.term_taxonomy_id WHERE tt.taxonomy IN ('category') AND tr.object_id IN (1866826) ORDER BY t.name ASC
Ariel Investments commentary for the month ended October 31, 2016.
As you know, we are celebrating the 30th anniversary of Ariel Fund, which has been continually managed by John W. Rogers, Jr. since its November 6, 1986 inception. It is very rare for any fund to survive 30 years, especially with the same manager. Many may not know just how rare it is.
According to Morningstar, there are currently 2,288 U.S. Equity mutual funds—one share class per fund. Setting aside funds lacking key data, we examined 2,279 funds. The table below shows groups of fund by longevity—the first column showing how many funds fall in an age range and the next showing how many funds have a manager whose tenure falls in that range.
[drizzle]As you can see, very old funds and very long manager tenures are rare, but the latter more so. Of the 2,279 funds in the table above, only 207, or 9% of this group, have 30 years like Ariel Fund does. That is ten times more common than a manager who has tenure of 30 years or more on the same fund: only 19 managers representing 0.8% of the funds in this group have done so.
We were also so struck by the brevity of most track records and manager tenures. Nearly one-third (31%) of U.S. equity mutual funds are less than ten years old. Moreover, almost two-thirds (62%) lack a manager with more than a decade’s experience on the fund. Admittedly this statistic does not fully measure manager experience; our own David Maley has managed Ariel Discovery Fund since its inception in 2011—despite decades managing money. Still, it is noteworthy that only half of the U.S. equity funds have a manager dating back to the Great Financial Crisis of 2007-2009.
Finally, a quick peek at returns. As you know, the subject now dominating discussions about investing is active versus passive, where the latter has captured consensus—a subject we addressed in our most recent traditional value quarterly letter. This month, we looked at funds with returns from November 6, 1986 through September 30, 2016. True, the S&P 500 Index did beat most of the funds. And yet, nearly one-third of the funds beat the broad market benchmark. Moreover, the top fund, Fidelity Contrafund, more than doubled the large-cap index’s cumulative return. Ariel Fund was among the funds trouncing the index, with a +11.19% annualized and +2,284.15% cumulative return, well above the +10.05% and +1,652.27% gains of the S&P 500 Index. All too often, the argument is constructed win/lose. We think it is worth remembering: this is investing, which is not measured in binary lead/lag terms but in dollars. And dozens of long-tenured managers have compounded dollars better for investors the last 30 years than a passive stake in an S&P 500 Index fund would have.
See the full PDF below.