The Fed Is Irrelevant: Low Interest Rates Are The New Normal by Sam McBride

It’s time to consider a new paradigm for interest rates – a paradigm where treasury rates remain ultra low and riskier investments are priced by a decentralized market instead of a central bank.

For years, we have been warned that interest rates will inevitably rise from their “artificially” low levels back to the “normal” levels of the early 2000’s.

In the mainstream narrative, the Fed has been artificially holding interest rates down to stimulate the economy, and soon it will have to raise rates to more normal levels. If it fails to do so, pundits warn, the economy could suffer dire consequences.

There are three problems with this narrative:

  1. Today’s low rates represent the long-run natural cost of capital.
  2. Perpetually low interest rates can have positive effects on the economy.
  3. The Fed doesn’t control interest rates, the market does.

Lower Rates Fit Long-Term Trend

Most analysts predicting a return to higher interest rates cite the past several decades as evidence that a higher cost of capital is the norm. Figure 1 shows the long-term trend in interest rates suggests otherwise. If we treat the massive spike in the late 20th century as an aberration, today’s low interest rates look like the continuation of a 200+ year trend.

Figure 1: Long-Term Decline In Interest Rates Low Interest Rates Sources:   Quartz
It’s not jus the Fed that’s been holding rates down for the past several years. It’s been structural shifts to the economy such as low inflation expectations, an aging population (more savers, fewer workers), increasing economic stability, and a variety of other factors recently detailed in the Wall Street Journal.

Not all fixed income securities will have low rates. We are saying that the floor on rates should remain low, and that the Fed would be well advised to recognize this shift as a new paradigm.

Politics Put A Ceiling On Rates

As low as our rates are now, they are still higher than most of the developed world, e.g. Japan and Europe. There are no signs that either of those central banks plans to raise rates in the foreseeable future. As a result, higher rates in the U.S. would further strengthen the dollar, put more strain on forex markets and undermine foreign revenues to our international companies.

In addition, think of the strain put on the U.S. government’s budget from a rise in treasury rates. Debt service costs could quickly become troublesome for our government if the Fed pushed rates back anywhere close to the old “normal”.

The Threat of Higher Rates Is Hurting Investment and Long-Term Growth Potential

The primary challenge facing our economy is that moderate-to-low ROIC opportunities are going unfunded despite an abundance of uninvested capital. The 2,183 Russell 3000 companies for which we have at least 5 years worth of data hold nearly $1.6 trillion in excess cash, up 43% from five years ago. Meanwhile, their invested capital is up just 25% over the same time period.

Companies have money on hand to invest in their operations, but they’re mostly choosing to hold that cash on the balance sheet or buyback stock. Many of these companies are holding back from making investments that would earn an ROIC in the low-to-mid single digits. These are investments that could generate positive economic earnings with today’s low interest rates but would look much less appealing if rates rose in the next few years.

Economists from Duke and the London School of Economics have shown that interest rate uncertainty significantly depresses the level of investment both on an individual firm level and throughout the economy. By constantly talking about raising short-term rates without setting a clear timeline, the Fed has created a great deal of uncertainty that is undermining growth.

If the Fed were to remove this uncertainty by announcing that it wouldn’t raise rates any time in the foreseeable future, companies would be more inclined to start investing in these moderate-to-low ROIC opportunities.

Homebuilding is a good example. The overall housing market may be recovering, but new housing starts remain persistently low. The 16 homebuilders we cover have a weighted average ROIC of 6%, putting them right on the bubble of economic profitability.

A signal that rates will stay low should encourage homebuilders to increase their level of investment. This would not only increase the country’s strained housing supply, it would also create jobs that might bring some of the 6 million people who want a job but aren’t actively looking for one back into the labor force.

The Threat of Higher Rates Is Hurting Employment

Workers trained for the old economy find their skills devalued, resulting in underemployment, unemployment, or an exit from the workforce.

Ideally, we want to retrain these workers to with the skills needed to find jobs in the high ROIC industries that are facing labor shortages. That level of training might not be feasible, so many of these discouraged workers are forced to the sidelines.

If the Fed tries to raise rates, business investing will fall even further, leaving more workers unemployed. Workers on the sidelines are a waste of human capital and turn into drains on society through things like unemployment benefits.

How the Fed Lost Control Over Interest Rates And Free Markets Took Over

As the dissemination of capital has been decentralized, so too has its pricing. Private equity firms, credit card lenders, and business development corporations all set their own rates based on their assessment of risk/reward.

Keep in mind; the Fed has never really directly controlled interest rates. Rather, it uses open market activity to influence the Federal Funds Rate, which is the rate banks charge each other to borrow reserves overnight. This practice could affect short-term interest rates when banks had a virtual monopoly on fixed income capital dissemination, but today’s more decentralized market makes it harder for the Fed to exert such direct control.

Why We Do Not Need Centralized Interest Rate Controls

As we establish in our report “How The Internet Economy Killed Inflation”, the inflation spikes that warranted higher interests rate are probably a thing of the past. In addition, there are a number of other technological and structural shifts in our economy that support a permanently lower cost of capital.

The past few decades have also seen a significant decentralization in the allocation of capital. Once upon a time, most capital was disseminated through the banking system. When loan officers were the primary distributors of fixed income capital, society needed to put a floor on interest rates to help ensure these officers allocated capital to investments that would earn a minimum level of return. Loan officers had no incentive to take risk most of the time, nor did they have much, if any, skin in the game.

In contrast, today, we have thousands of non-bank financial institutions—from credit card companies to peer-to-peer lenders – to provide capital to businesses and individuals. Crowd-sourced funding has launched major companies like Oculus Rift, and websites like Angel List make it easier for startups all over the country to find VC investors. These agents have skin in the game and require no outside incentive to seek higher returns and optimize their risk/reward.

Markets Are Better Than

1, 2  - View Full Page