Hillary Clinton: A Portrait Of Power And Corruption
In The Picture of Dorian Gray , a decaying painting is locked away to decay in its attic mausoleum as a symbol of a beautiful boy’s tarnished soul. By way of contrast, the embodiment of America’s ruling class now lives and breathes in the public persona of one person, Hillary Clinton.
Compromise after compromise of principles is made for the sake of power. After years of toiling in the halls of power, the presidency finally seems hers for the taking. Yet, the closer Hillary comes to assuming the presidential chair, the closer Americans examine her public pose only to recoil.
Many Americans agree there is something about the shadow and shade of Hillary’s portrait that leaves more questions than answers, a “touch of cruelty” seeping through the cracks in her carefully crafted façade.
In a word, many Americans find her “mendacious,” and the revelations regarding the appearance of the Clinton State Department’s “pay-to-play” scheme – delivering special access and favors to Clinton Foundation donors – is only the latest episode in a long series of scandals besmirching her trustworthiness.
The revelations – and there are more to come and they will never end – is shocking and not shocking. If you think government is good, clean, and constantly striving for the public good, seeing all this up close must be startling. Most thinking people long ago let go of their naïveté about government and therefore find nothing particularly surprising about any of this.
Is this appearance of impropriety just in the eyes of her beholders? Are Americans simply projecting their worst fears about their politics onto her as the Clintons and their supporters would have us believe? Or is there something truly nefarious lurking beneath the surface?
I venture the answer is a bit of both.
Hillary Clinton strikes me at once as a Faustian figure, but rather than making a deal with the devil for eternal youth or unlimited knowledge, she has asked for state power.
Spurred by her idealism to serve the poor and underprivileged, this victim of her own privilege has engaged in a bargain time immemorial: give me the power of the state to kill and steal and coerce other people with impunity, and I will use this power to bring social justice to the land. Like most before her who have made this pact, the promise of power consumes and corrupts her noble goals.
Where power may begin as simply a means to achieve one’s dreams, winning and wielding power ultimately becomes the dream itself. Compromise after compromise of principles is made for the sake of power. Sacrifice after sacrifice of others is offered for the sake of power. Lie after lie is told for the sake of keeping the truth of power-hungry dreams alive. One’s ideals become hollow pretense, mere words, and the curse of power takes hold, i.e. for every good deed done, two or three “necessary” evils must be committed.
Such appears to be the tragic tale of Hillary Rodham Clinton.
The Radical Turned Establishment Figure
In 1969, Hillary Clinton wrote her senior thesis, titled “There Is Only the Fight,” on the work of that now infamous radical, Saul Alinsky. Alinsky seems to have played the same role for young Hillary Rodham that Lord Henry Wotton played for young Dorian Gray – the enchanting snake in the Garden of Eden. At the beginning of his own book, Rules for Radicals, Alinsky quotes himself:
Lest we forget at least an over-the-shoulder acknowledgment to the very first radical: from all our legends, mythology, and history (and who is to know where mythology leaves off and history begins — or which is which), the first radical known to man who rebelled against the establishment and did it so effectively that he at least won his own kingdom — Lucifer.
That said, Hillary diverges with her role model Alinsky in her thesis on one crucial point. Rather than rebelling against the establishment to win her own kingdom, she would become the establishment . Mark Leibovich provides a telling summary of this schism in his 2007 piece for The New York Times:
Beyond Mr. Alinsky, the treatise yields insights about its author. Gaining power, Ms. Rodham asserted, was at the core of effective activism. It “is the very essence of life, the dynamo of life,” she wrote, quoting Mr. Alinsky.
Ms. Rodham endorsed Mr. Alinsky’s central critique of government antipoverty programs — that they tended to be too top-down and removed from the wishes of individuals.
But the student leader split with Mr. Alinsky over a central point. He vowed to “rub raw the sores of discontent” and compel action through agitation. This, she believed, ran counter to the notion of change within the system.
Nearly half a century after these youthful aspirations, Hillary Clinton appears to have nearly come full circle. No longer is she simply the academic activist adorned with thick-framed spectacles hoping to change the establishment from within.
At this point, Hillary Clinton is, indeed, the establishment. She is one of the many faces of American power for many at home and abroad. But will she become the ultimate face of American power? Will Hillary Clinton become the first woman to have her portrait rendered as President of the United States?
Well, before that questioned is answered, Americans should be asking more questions not only about Hillary Clinton but about very the nature of state power itself.
Do Hillary Clinton’s “noble” ends justify her choice of means, her ambitions for state power?
In my opinion, the answer is a firm “no,” but I do not say this as something unique to Hillary Clinton. She comes from a long line of murders and thieves dressed up in high ideals – the type of person Isabel Paterson once called the “humanitarian with the guillotine,” – those who, as Paterson wrote, cause great harm as “the result of their deliberate actions, long persevered in, which they hold to be motivated by high ideals toward virtuous ends.” In step, Hillary is quick to downplay her mistakes and the “collateral damage” left in her wake in the name of her “virtuous ends.”
One may realize the promise of power is one of the oldest temptations known to man, leading to mistake after bloody mistake. Just think of all the “humanitarian” foreign policy adventures to Hillary’s name, carried out with weapons much more powerful than any guillotine – she pushed the bombing of former Yugoslavia in the 1990s, advocated strongly for the invasion of Iraq in 2003, supported the 2009 troop surge in Afghanistan (which lead to the majority of American deaths in the Afghan war), orchestrated the 2009 coup in Honduras , supported the revolutionary overthrow of Hosni Mubarak 2011, lead the policy to violently overthrow Libyan President Muammar Gaddafi in the same year only to smugly giggle at his death , and persists in her defense of the use of drones warfare that kills innocents across the globe from Yemen to Pakistan while continuing to