Emerging Value Capital Management letter to investors for the first quarter ended March 31, 2016.

Get The Timeless Reading eBook in PDF

Get the entire 10-part series on Timeless Reading in PDF. Save it to your desktop, read it on your tablet, or email to your colleagues.

Dear Partners and Shareholders,

For the first quarter of 2016, Emerging Value Capital Management fund declined an estimated -3.5% net to investors. Stock markets worldwide were mixed in the quarter with the All Country World Index (ACWI) and the HFRI Equity Hedge Index up +0.2% and down -1.7% respectively.

Emerging Value Capital Management 1Q16 Letter To Investors

Since inception (10/15/2008), Emerging Value Capital ManagementFund returned an estimated +97.9% (net to investors). During this same time period the MSCI All Country World Index (ACWI) and the HFRI Equity Hedge Index returned approximately +83.4% and +40.5% respectively.

Emerging Value Capital Management 1Q16 Letter To Investors

Emerging Value Capital Management - Q1 Market & Portfolio Overview:

Stock markets were volatile during Q1. Major market indexes declined around 10% by February and then recovered sharply in March. Investors were concerned about a slowdown in China, the impact of falling oil prices beyond the energy sector and the risk of a recession in the U.S. These concerns abated to some extent in March as oil prices recovered to around $40/barrel and U.S. economic data indicated a recession was not imminent.

As we have previously written, lower oil prices are a blessing to the world and serve as a powerful economic stimulus. The prospect of steadily rising U.S. interest rates, which seemed all but certain a few months ago, now looks unlikely. Continued low interest rates, cheap money and a lack of attractive investment alternatives should keep investor capital flowing into stock markets. We therefore expect the bull market in U.S. stocks to continue in 2016, although with increased volatility.

While market indexes are little changed in Q1, there is a large disparity in the year-to-date returns (or losses) among individual stocks. As value investors this works in our favor since it allows us to deploy more capital into the stocks we like and that are relative laggards.

More specifically, we used the market volatility in the quarter to accomplish five key objectives:

1) Buy more of many of our positions that we know and like including: Berkshire Hathaway, Interactive Brokers, Amerco, Howard Hughes Corp, Basket of large cap US Financials and GSE Securities.

2) Sell lesser quality positions where we no longer have conviction including: General Motors1, Horsehead Holdings and Qualcomm.

3) Continue shifting our portfolio into higher quality stocks and less risky regions and industries. In terms of business quality and economic moats, our current portfolio is the best it has ever been.

4) Increase the level of concentration in our portfolio – our top 10 positions now comprise 70.7% of our capital compared to 58.4% of our capital at the beginning of 2016. 5) Increase our cash position to about 14% (18% as of end of April) from about 9% at the beginning of 2016 so we have the flexibility to quickly invest in opportunities created by the increased market volatility.

We are very excited about the prospects for our current portfolio. We own a concentrated collection of quality businesses trading well below their intrinsic economic values.

Emerging Value Capital Management 1Q16 Letter To Investors

In the next section, we will go into greater detail on some of these positions. For now, however, we think it is important to point out that our top 10 longs make up over 70% of our long exposure as we have increased the position sizes of our highest conviction ideas. As of quarter end, we were 86% long and 5% short. Our overall net exposure level of 81% reflects the compelling bargains we are finding in global stock markets.

Emerging Value Capital Management - Main contributors in Q1-2016:

Despite our overall bullishness on our current portfolio, it stumbled along with the markets in the first quarter. Our only significant contributors to performance in the first quarter were Isras Investments and Samsung Electronics.

Isras Investments

Isras, a leading real-estate development company in Israel, reported excellent results for 2015. The company generated record NOI (net operating income) from its owned real estate properties and also recorded upwards revaluations on its portfolio. In addition to strong results, the recent addition of Isras into the Tel-Aviv100 stock index helped push up the stock price as investors became aware of the company and its cheapness (both absolute and relative to peers). We invested in Isras right after management announced a new dividend policy where they would pay out an annual dividend equal to 35% of FFO (about 3% dividend yield). Our thesis was that the company is shifting its focus from extensive real-estate asset development to real-estate asset management.

We continue to hold the stock today as its book value of 1.75B ILS understates the Company’s true economic value for several reasons. First, Isras values its yielding assets at 8%-9% cap rates which are above market rates. Second, Isras owns land assets recorded at low historical purchase costs which have not yet been marked up on its books. Third, Isras has tax loss assets that are not on its books. The company trades for 85% of reported book value and about 70% of our estimate of adjusted book value. In comparison, peers trade for about 120% of book value implying significant additional upside for Isras.

Samsung Electronics

Samsung Electronics, the world’s largest integrated consumer electronics manufacturer, recovered somewhat in Q1 thanks to better than expected results in both its smartphone and NAND product lines. Investors were pleased with good Galaxy S7 smart phone sales and with the company executing the second tranche of its share buyback program. The stock price increased somewhat following these results.

While investors remain overly focused on smart-phones, we feel that they fail to notice Samsung’s many other highly valuable business segments (DRAM, NAND, chipsets, displays, digital cameras, television sets, tablets, laptops, networking equipment and home appliances) as well as its competitive moat. Thanks to its size, Samsung enjoys low manufacturing costs (economies of scale) and high bargaining power with suppliers. To put its size in perspective, Samsung sells twice as many smartphones as Apple. Samsung gains additional competitive advantages from its vertical integration, with internal production of many of its own chipsets, memory circuits, and displays.

The consumer electronics space continues to expand with new product categories emerging that did not even exist a few years ago such as house cleaning robots, smart watches, virtual reality headsets, personal fitness trackers, personal health monitors, Internet connected home appliances and more. Samsung is already leveraging its size and competitive advantages to become a leading supplier in all of these categories. Needless to say, all these devices will also require chipsets and memory components that Samsung will supply. Over the years Samsung has created tremendous shareholder value and will continue to do so in the future. Samsung is cheap by any valuation metric. It trades for 8x earnings, 90% of book value, and 2.6x EV to EBITDA. At the current stock price, we are paying fair market value for the non-smart phone businesses and essentially getting the smart-phone business for free.

Emerging Value Capital Management 1Q16 Letter To Investors

Emerging Value Capital Management - Main detractors in Q1-2016:


1, 2  - View Full Page