Howard Hughes, Book Value & Oil?? by Todd Sullivan, ValuePlays

I will note here that I did reach out to the folks at Saibus last week and did manage to have a conversation last Friday about their piece. I had hoped that some of the errors contained here would be corrected but they have not. Since I continue to get questions on it, I’m obliged to respond…

The first issue that was brought up was valuation and it contains a critical flaw….

If Howard Hughes can continue its recent run of impressive growth, it could potentially achieve or exceed its prerecession highs of $548.7M in total revenues last achieved in 2006. Howard Hughes’s recent growth in its strategic development asset base is impressive as is its Master Planned Communities segment but we believe that the company is trading at a rich valuation of 2.6X Book Value and 33X TTM operating income

Here is the flaw: Any company that holds real estate is required to hold it on its books at “the lesser of cost or replacement value”. That means a company like Howard Hughes Corp (NYSE:HHC) is required to hold the value of the properties they inherited from General Growth Properties Inc (NYSE:GGP) in its Chapter 11 at a small fraction of their true value.

Two examples:

As of 12/31 the South Street Seaport property that is going to be home to 360k ft of retail space (phase two will add another ~300k sqft) and two condo towers is being held on the books at $47M (2013 annual report pgs 103-104).  Even a little cocktail napkin math tells us 660k sq ft at $200sq ft and a 5% cap rate (both VERY reasonable assumptions for waterfront NYC retail space) gives us a valuation for JUST the retail section there of  $2B or so… a bit of a far cry from the $47M “book value” it is being held at . I’ll also note here that we haven’t even touched any potential value for the two waterfront condo towers or any additional development. Not sure how familiar you may be with NYC real estate, but those are gonna be worth more than a little bit.  Finally, the $200sqft assumption for rent is going to prove grossly conservative once things get cranked up there. $400 sqft is wholly reasonable in which case we can say that the Seaport area development is worth ~85% of the current market cap of the entire company at that rent.

Honolulu:

Ward Center is 60 acres ocean front land Howard Hughes Corp (NYSE:HHC) is approved to build 4,000 residential units (condo/apartment towers) and >1MM sqft office and retail space.  It is being held at a “book value” of $370M. Let that sink in.

Sunk in?

The residential first tower, One Al Moana went on sale in December 2012 and sold out 204 units in two days for an average price of $1.6M. So, a property that will support another 3,796 residential units and >1MM sqft retail and office space just sold its first units and will bring at closing $326M of revenue….is worth $370M? ……. In order to be using simple book value on Howard Hughes Corp (NYSE:HHC) you have to believe that is true…

Tower 2 and 3 are 80% sold out and Tower 4 has been approved….

We can do this easily…… what would a developer pay for 60 acres ocean front land in Honolulu approved for 4000 residential units plus a huge office/retail component? What would you sell it for? $370M? I didn’t think so…

The second “risk” they state is oil. This seems to matter because Howard Hughes Corp (NYSE:HHC) has been trading like an energy company in recent weeks…:

One risk to Howard Hughes is the oil and gas markets as the price of West Texas Intermediate oil has dropped 38% since August 2013. Howard Hughes is indirectly exposed to the oil and gas markets because the company will spend $171.5M to build two office buildings that are pre-leased to Exxon Mobil Corporation (NYSE:XOM). Other oil and gas corporate campuses at Howard Hughes’ The Woodlands property include Chevron Phillips, Anadarko Petroleum, and Baker Hughes. In addition, the construction of the Grand Parkway (Texas State Highway 99) will connect Howard Hughes Bridgeland MPC community and its The Woodlands MPC community to ExxonMobil’s new office campus. Howard Hughes expects that ExxonMobil will employ 10,000 at the campus, though if oil prices maintain its downward trend, we expect revenue headwinds for its Strategic Development and MPC business segments.

Let’s go through this. While 10,000 people will be employed there by Exxon, (it isn’t Howard Hughes Corp (NYSE:HHC) saying this, it is Exxon saying it), the reality is that there will be a total of ~20,000 “workers” there daily (this includes contractors, vendors, ancillary workers, visitors etc). Exxon spent $1B constructing the campus and has already moved 3,000 people there. There is NO chance it does not get used. In fact they are creating such demand there they have leased the above mentioned building in the Woodlands from Howard Hughes. The leases are signed, Exxon Mobil Corporation (NYSE:XOM) needs the space, it is a done deal.

But what about oil prices?

In June 2008 oil hit $145/barrel and then it collapsed to $43/barrel in March 2009 as the “great recession” began……does that drop sound familiar? For reference that drop is roughly 3X the current price retreat. Let’s look and see what Houston home prices did during that time? It only makes sense that if this oil drop is going to hurt Houston and by association Howard Hughes, we ought to look back at the most recent oil collapse for a guide…no?

In June 2008 the median home price in Houston was $174k and the 75th percentile median home was $291k (it is important because Howard Hughes Corp (NYSE:HHC) is building at the higher end). After oil collapsed $100/barrel over the next 9 months the median Houston home price in March 2009 was $184k and the 75th percentile median was $322K*.

Um, that doesn’t make sense….we were just told the opposite was going to happen.  Falling oil prices would lead to falling home prices.

Why then? Well Houston’s economy has made a material shift from its once complete dominance by the fluctuations in oil prices.  Below is data from October ’14 from Houston.org. Of the the 2.9M people employed in the greater Houston area, only 118k or 5% are employed in “oil & gas exploration and support activities”. In fact employment there is dwarfed by retail trade, health care, government, lodging etc….

Howard Hughes

That is why, during the last collapse in oil prices saw Houston home prices rising.   People from all professions have been moving to Houston for a decade now both aiding the housing market and diversifying its economy away from the pure oil and gas boom/bust cycle of previous years. Further, should the fall in oil prices cause a cutback in drilling and exploration, that won’t happen  in Houston where the HQ’s are. That will happen in places like the Bakken and Utica shale regions causing unemployment there to rise. I am not saying energy no longer matters to Houston, to be sure it does, it is just not as overwhelmingly dominant as it was even a decade ago. Houston

1, 2  - View Full Page