Exchange SROs: Meeting the Needs of Investors and the Financial Marketplace
- How do exchange SROs contribute to the effective functioning of the securities markets?
- How has the role of exchanges changed since they were first designated as SROs, and have these changes affected their ability to function effectively in that role?
- Do recent breakdowns in exchange oversight functions indicate a need for an overhaul of structure/functions or point to “fatal flaws” in the current system?
- Are conflicts in the current system of demutualized exchanges resolvable or inherent in the system?
- What needs to be done to reinforce the integrity of the system and increase investor protections?
- How does increased competition from broker/dealer internalization networks and foreign trading markets affect exchanges under the constraints of the current self-regulatory system?
Centennial Professor of Law, Brooklyn Law School
Former Commissioner of the US Securities and Exchange Commission
The change from fixed commissions was significant. NASD traders had preferential rates trading with one another. Existing SROs continued on. Expulsion was a threat. Exchange listing standards were a significant protection.
Many markets, and profit seeking exchanges have changed matters. Sarbox and Dodd-Frank have affected matters with listing requirements. JOBS act has opened up listing standards, and perhaps not in a good way. SEC was happy to see the monopoly of the NYSE broken, but there have been unanticipated secondary effects. We need to ask what kind of regulation we need now in the present environment.
Richard G. Ketchum
Chairman and CEO, Financial Industry Regulatory Authority
Mentions MS was the first Chair of FINRA. Merger of NASD and NYSE Reg. FINRA has an enhanced majority of public governors. No way for industry to capture FINRA. Oversees all bond and equity trading. Exchange SROs can delegate to FINRA, but they must oversee what FINRA does for them.
Vice Chairman of the Advisory Board, Promontory Financial Group
Former Chairman of the US Securities and Exchange Commission
Former CEO of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA)
Former Chairman of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission
SROs are cost-effective and flexible, with deep expertise. Examine participants, Surveill markets, etc. New tech, markets, exchanges as profit-seeking entities are new challenges. Conflicts of interest have grown along with HFT.
Moderated by: Andrew N. Vollmer, University of Virginia School of Law
Q: Does the current system work well? What areas do we need to change?
MS: It’s working well. Vigilence is needed. Well-functioning SROs are an aid to regulators. Easier for an SRO to address an issue with stakeholders.
RK: Wants the SEC to have a bigger budget, merge the CFTC into the SEC. SROs are necessary now because the system won’t work without them. Fragmentation of trading makes self-regulation less effective.
ANV asks RGK to reply.
RGK says FINRA aids regulators. FINRA brings knowledge, focus and access. Government regulators are more confrontational, FINRA can get more done. Exchanges are the only ones enforcing listing standards.
MS concurs that listing standards are needed.
Q: Have we lost some of the benefits of SROs with the delegation of authority to FINRA?
RGK: has worked with SROs his whole life. Comments how things were often worse in the past, not all things are worse today.
MS: Concurs with RGK.
RK: There has been loss, much of it through the destruction of exchange-based trading. 2008 meltdown — few firms did anything to stop the crisis. Everyone acted in their own interest.
Q: Aside from listing standards, what other things should the exchange SROs do?
MS: Exchanges will always be responsible for aspects of investor protection.
RK: Exchanges will always have an interest in the integrity of their markets.
RGK: Comments that exchanges should watch over the quality of products traded [DM: think of leveraged and inverse ETFs, ETNs, penny stocks, promoted stocks, etc.]
Q: What about efficiency at the SRO level?
MS: Competition and efficiency don’t always work well together. SEC and CFTC should be merged.
RK: SEC and CFTC should be merged. Need more than one regulator, though. Did not work in the UK. FSOC a disaster, a non-solution.
RGK: We interact with everyone. No opinion on whether the SEC and CFTC should be merged.